Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Feminspire | May 24, 2013

Scroll to top

Top

4 Comments

Why Don’t Women Have A Word Like “Emasculate”?

Why Don’t Women Have A Word Like “Emasculate”?

Whether it’s a heavy box to be carried, a bug to be squished, or something to be fixed, I hate hearing the words, “Just let the guys do it.”

Even in reverse, when there is something to be baked, gardening to be done, or cleaning to complete, I often hear, “Just let the girls do it.”

Stop it. Just stop. There is no set task that only one specific gender is capable of doing (with few exceptions like giving birth). Don’t assume that I need a man to help me. It’s belittling, embarrassing, it’s… dammit, there isn’t even a word for it! Why don’t we have a word like “emasculate” for women? When I try to apply it to the word “feminine,” all I can think of is “efeminate,” which is basically “effeminate” and that’s not what I mean at all. Even Microsoft Word tried to correct “efeminate” to “effeminate.” Don’t rub it in my face that there isn’t a word!

This conversation stems from an incident about a year ago when I felt most offended by a “Just let the guys do it” comment. There were heavy boxes filled with packets that needed to be moved to the other side of the office, and me, someone who lifted weights at the time and immediately launched into action. As I reached for a box, one of my co-workers stopped me and said, “Oh, just the let the guys move them.” I looked around at the guys she was referring to, and found myself face-to-face with a set of scrawny men and one who was overweight who began to try and lift the boxes with obvious distress.

Their male status immediately trumped my strength. I don’t get it. If I didn’t think I was capable, I wouldn’t have offered to help. In that moment, I was undermined for my strength.

How do we even begin to search for a word that would emulate a woman’s feelings in that moment? Is there a word that would best describe a time when a woman felt like her physical abilities were judged based on her gender? Yes, there’s “de-feminized,” but it does not have the meaning I am trying to convey. To “de-feminize” is to divest a woman of female qualities and essentially “masculinize” her. But why do we need to be stripped of our femininity in order to be strong human beings?

A woman may dress in a feminine manner and enjoy watching Giada At Home, but that doesn’t stop her from being the beast she is at the gym, lifting weights and kicking ass. She is a strong lady, not a masculine lady. If you are confident in your physical capabilities, there should definitely be a new way to describe being offended if someone dismisses it to “let the guys do it.”

I know many men would say that it’s polite to do heavy work as part of being a gentleman, but there is also a large population of women who want to be your equal and don’t enjoy having things done for them just because history, media, and other large demographical influences say so.

A more preferred response to me offering to help carry the boxes would have been silence, or even a “Thanks for helping out.” I understand her intentions were not an attempt to strip me of my dignity, but if a woman offers to lift boxes, kill a spider, or change the oil on a car, let her. She knows what she is capable of and it is probably more than you would imagine.

Written by Leah Moreno

  • http://www.facebook.com/marlenaraec Marlena Carcone

    Hell yeah.

  • Guest

    “defeminize”?

    • Sarah

      yup

  • Ennoia

    But what does our ability to do things have to do with our gender? I enjoyed your article but I think that it’s missing a very important point. The reason the word ‘emasculate’ exists and means what it means is the implied ‘demotion’ of the man to a woman’s less respected/capable status. In other words, ‘emasculate’ is said because being masculine is equated with good/strong/independent, and being less masculine is thus a bad thing. The word is an insult to anyone who is not male or masculine.

    It’s sexist to even equate anyone’s ability to do anything with their gender or biological sex, and I don’t think women should jump on this bandwagon (also this will never catch on in a patriarchal world). It’s like starting to call female cowards ‘cock’ or ‘ball sack’ because cowardly men are referred to as ‘pussies’. This would not change the values of the society we live in and instead only cement sexist ideology.

    I think the word we should all use is ‘patronize’. It means treating the other person like a child or someone of a lower/dependent standing. Being a child, unlike being a woman or a man, is actually an indicator of being less than independent, of needing help where others don’t. You can also call it ‘condescending’ when someone treats you like you are less than you are. Or ‘disrespectful’. Or simply tell them in more words, and explain to them why it’s rude.