Why Are Girls Called “Sluts” But Guys Are “Just Having Fun”?

What does it mean to be a “slut”? By Merriam-Webster’s definition it’s an “especially promiscuous woman,” and often synonymous with being called a prostitute. This term, of course, applies only only to the female gender and is highly subjective across many known dictionaries. There are also words specifically for those of the male gender using this definition, but more often than not, the words do not share the same connotation, meaning that they don’t share the same level of shame by association. The word “slut” is utilized as an offensive term of disparagement, singularly directed at those of the female gender.

But who is to decide what an excess level of promiscuity may be? How many is too many partners? And most importantly, is this even a word we should even attribute value to?

Sexual promiscuity has always been an issue that concerns reputation and self-esteem for women. Men have generally viewed female promiscuity as how many people someone has slept with.

A woman who openly enjoys sex and is as casual about it in the same way that many men are should not have her worth demeaned and assessed by the general public just because of her gender. “Slut” has become a common term for women who enjoy casual sex. Calling someone a slut does not only sort them into a sexist perspective of thought, but it also lessens the worth of women by attaching a stigma to their actions but not to the same actions being carried out by men. You can’t have two people of the opposite gender performing the same set of actions, but attach a negatively contorted label of “slut” to only one of those genders. It just doesn’t make sense.

When people begin assessing fewer sex partners with being more respectable, people whose desires are outside those boundaries have to either trade in their desires in order to be accepted and respected within society, or simply face the backlash of having those desires fulfilled. Labeling someone a slut based on their sexual expression does not only label someone based on the outward expression, but it also takes away from what might be causing this type of outward expression, such as how the person is being prompted. How we perceive people coined with the term slut really conceals the character within the person in question.

Image courtesy of Olivia Harris/Reuters

As blogger Charlie Glickman put it best:

Slut-shaming collapses the complexity of another person onto a single dimension. But even more so, given how slut-shaming is used to control and shame all women regardless of their sexual practices or desires, it conflicts directly with respecting them. If you say that you respect women, then you need to respect all women, no matter how many sexual partners she has, her relationship choices, or how she enjoys sex. Otherwise, you’re saying that your respect is something that someone has to buy. I don’t think that that’s really respect at all.

Slut-shaming the female gender also empowers the hypocritical notion that when men behave in a promiscuous manner with no stigma or negativity attached, they are just trying to enjoy their own sexuality. Allowing men to behave in a similar manner without all of the societal implications degrades a woman for her sexual liberation. Degrading someone’s confidence in their sexuality as well as their expression of sexuality by slut-shaming them degrades the female gender as a whole.

Next time you hear about the girl next door sleeping around with one “too many” men, you might want to rethink judging her on her outward expression and instead try to connect with the inward expression of what prompted her to do so. Perhaps she was having a summer fling, or maybe it was at attempt at failed romance, or perhaps it was done in or out of love; all the same, these are choices made out of sexual expression and personal choice and not ones that should be seen as shameful.

Written by Angelica Alvarez
Follow her on Tumblr!

Opinions stated in our editorials do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Feminspire and it’s staff as a whole, but instead reflect the opinions of the writer.

http://twitter.com/abbeybabbling Abigail Lewis

This idea of outward ‘promiscuity’ being far less important than inner ‘prompt’ is something I haven’t seen before, and it’s a fascinating one. You’re so right. As humans we obsess over what motivated who to do what but when it comes to ‘sluts’, many people ignore motivation and focus irrationally on action.
Connor

Because it’s very, very easy for a woman to find sexual partners, where as it is hard to find one being a male. The same logic can be held here.
It’s easier for women to get sex partners for men, so if she’s doing it, she’s a slut. It’s easier for men to do physical labour than for women, so if he isn’t, he’s less of a man. Thes lables don’t just come off from sexist descrimination, it comes from the ability to do acts with ease compared to the other group.
If a woman fits under the definition of the word slut, then she’s a slut. That word has always been around, and just because you find it degrading doesn’t change it’s definition and if you come under it or not.
If I see a man acting like a “slut”, then I would call him a man-whore, or a man-slut, it’s simple. The irritating part is that females like this are barely called sluts anymore. Sometimes they’re called easy to get, which in a lot of cases is true, and even then if it’s true women will get irritated. In my experience, I have witnessed far more women call other women sluts than I have seen men call women sluts, yet all the blame for this “slut” name calling goes to men for women calling eachother it? If you want to see the reason why being called a slut is as popular as it is (not that popular from my experience) then look to the women you are supporting, because they are the primary reasons for it continuing.
Not only that, it goes against all logic that men would insult women that are more available to sex, so why would they insult them?

Main point in short: Don’t blame the male gender for what the female gender are the primary cause of.
- Vita
  
  Your “logic” and reasoning is so far off base I don’t even know where to begin. But how about to start, don’t make these sweeping generalizations about what men and women can and can’t do with ease.
  Your attitude is a perfect example of how “the male gender” can’t accept and acknowledge the constant demoralizing language and behavior they perpetuate. You are a MAN – you have no authority to talk about how the word “slut” affects women, let alone deny that your gender is the primary cause of it’s negative connotation.
  - Connor
    
    Vita, I would actually accept your counter argument if you actually begun to explain “why” my logic is “far off” instead of just stating it is with different wordings two to three times.
    I’m a man, so therefor I can’t observe or make an accurate conclusion on the negative points women have, such as calling eachother sluts? Then who are you to say that you can do that to males?
    Ofcourse, I am no fool, I knew exactly the reaction I would get here, I knew exactly that there wouldn’t be much, if any, women taking responsibility for things they are just as guilty for.
    Don’t underestimate the ability of empathy and observation. No, women are not some unknown species that males can’t understand, we can assume to know how something feels due to empathy or our own experiences with things that run under the same angle with great accuracy.
    It isn’t a generalization, it is a simple fact. I like how you are sitting there saying that I am a man, so I can’t know what it’s like to be in a certain situation for a woman, yet you are implying you know that it isn’t easy for a female to find a male willing to have sex with them. As a male, I can inform you due to observation and personal interest, women can get sex if they just ask a man. “You are a “WOMAN” – you have no authority to talk about how men would react to simply being asked for sexual activity”.
    Ofcourse, in your mind the same logic I just used against you only works if it’s in your favour, right? I have no doubt that even though I used the exact same logic, that one gender can’t know the feelings, etc, of the other, you will say that the logic I used (your logic) is bogus.
    It is not a generalization to say what men and women can do with ease, especially when it runs in roots with our primal nature and biology, the same nature we have today. Men are stronger than women, so if they can’t do something that involves physical labour, they’re not as impressive as the men that can (assuming they have the same intellect). Women can get sex easier, I know this myself simply due to observation, and being a man, that if asked bluntly, the answer would be yes.
    I can deny, and I have full “authority” to deny that something “your” gender is responsible for is giving the gender I belong to a negative look. Who are you to say I have no authority to deny something that obviously isn’t true? You think simply because you have a vagina that I am to just accept what you say? Sorry, it doesn’t work that way. I wouldn’t act that way to a man, nor will I act that way to a woman.
    I have no objections that these definitions and words, such as “slut” came from males, I do however dissagree that they are the group using the term the most, especially given that I was raised amongst women most of my life and experienced first hand how negative women are to others of the same gender.
    
    Don’t simply say my logic is wrong, you need to explain why my logic is wrong,
    - http://www.robotsandlace.com/ Jess Mary
      
      Hi Connor,
      
      First of all, I think it’s just as damaging when women call women sluts–and very often it is a woman calling another woman a slut! Women can be agents of a sexist society too. It’s important to realize that critically examining our culture to figure out how sexism (and racism, homophobia, etc.) is at play there does not mean we have to create a men vs women who-will-be-the-scapegoat type situation.
      
      I would like to know what justification you have for the statement that it’s very easy for women to get sexual partners whereas it’s hard for men. Maybe it’s easy for leggy thin charming women, but certainly we can agree that it’s not productive to think about only the stereotypically beautiful women (or the stereotypically beautiful men)–unless you’re trying to argue that only women who are actress-level deserve to have sex (and I really don’t think/hope that’s what you’re arguing.)
      
      I know you said ‘your observations’ but I’d like to know more before you use that! I have just as many observations of the opposite being true!
      
      And even if you’re right, why does it matter? If something’s easy, does that necessarily mean it’s wrong and we should be less respected for that? Are you trying to argue that the reason why a man getting a ton of sexual partners is something laudable is because he has to work for it, whereas a woman has to work hard to NOT sleep around, so we need to celebrate her when she doesn’t give in?
      
      That doesn’t make sense to me. Please explain your logic.
      - Connor
        
        I completely agree. It is appauling, but instead of trying to use one group as a scapegoat (even when they aren’t the primary cause of it) doesn’t do anything to solve the problem. I believe that instead of using the maine group of people doing it as a scapegoat, we need such people to take responsibility and notice what they’re doing. Once that is done, work as a whole to stop it happening, not just for insults directed to women, but specific insults directed to any specific group of people.
        
        I personally see it as very easy for a woman to get a male sex partner just by bluntly asking. Men have higher sex drives than women, and they are more sex driven than females, it’s been part of the male gender since our primal stage.
        I believe that most males will have sex with any female (aslong as they aren’t in any very unhealthy state) as long as it doesn’t result in a long time relationship. Think about it. Something you want, yet don’t need to take responsibility for a long time to get, surely you would want it if it’s that easy to get, right?
        I’m not saying all men will, obviously not all men will, but I believe most men will.
        I am unsure of what you were saying there about actress level women only allowed to have sex, although that is definetly not what I think, obviously anyone should be allowed sex (aslong as it’s not forced).
        
        Just because something is easy doesn’t make it wrong, obviously not, but that doesn’t mean that easy th ings can’t be wrong to do. To a sociopath, killing someone can be easy – wrong.
        To a nice, freidnly person, helping someone across the street can be easy – good thing to do.
        I think having sex with too many partners is a bad thing for both genders. A one time fling can result in a pregnancy, and then that could lead to single parenthood or a child being brought in to a family surrounding that isn’t stable and was brought upon by a one night stand.
        
        I like to use this saying – “Understandable, but not excusable”. I think it’s understandable for men to have more sexual partners due to their sex drive, I don’t find it acceptable, though. Same goes for both genders.
      - http://www.robotsandlace.com/ Jess Mary
        
        I don’t think that it’s as easy for a woman to get a male sex partner as you think. MAYBE it’s true that she can just bluntly ask, but we’re conditioned not to do that. If you polled a bunch of women, I bet you would find that a vast majority are terrified to approach a man about a drink, let alone sex! Why? Because women are conditioned to feel like they need to be chased–or else they’re sluts. As a woman, I can honestly say that it’s not as easy as you think. So let’s throw out the easy/not easy argument–it’s interesting from a philosophical point of view, but not relevant. Not to be blunt, but I think your argument is based on the idea that women can easily get sex, which is not true, or at least most women feel like it’s not true. Samantha Jones from Sex and the City is not the kind of person who is typical of female sexuality.
        
        Seems like what you’re promoting is safe, responsible sex. Great, me too! I just don’t think the number of partners matters–rather, how you behave yourself is.
        
        Let me propose a scenario to you: you’re a young virgin who falls in love with the handsome young lead singer of a rock group. He goes on tour a lot, but he calls you every day, and when you’re together, he’s wonderful. You have sex without a condom. You get pregnant, and you find out that he’s been using IV drug needles and has HIV. Now you’re infected, he’s infected, your baby might be infected. You can get irresponsibly pregnant no matter how much you love someone/how “respectable” your sex is. The way to decrease unwanted pregnancies isn’t by stigmatizing promiscuity–it’s by education about safe sex.
      - Dingobabies
        
        If an average women asks 50 straight bachelors
        If they would like to have sex 50 of them will say yes. Vice versa the average man would be labeled a creep and maybe get 1 out of the 50 to say yes. Its not that difficult of a concept to understand. I know this because myself and all the available bachelors i know would say yes(if you didnt your sexuality would be questioned), because female
        Escorts are a bustling buisness and have never heard of a male escort, and because porn websites have sdvertisements for websites regarding unattractive women who want nsa sex. I really dont understand what is so difficult for you to comprehend.
      - Kundah
        
        conjecture. show me empirical research please? I would not label a man asking for sex a ‘creep’ unless he was creepy.
        
        Also, I think it is really sad that if a man refuses sex his sexuality would be questioned. I’ve not expereinced it or observed it in my life but wow, this should be addressed if it is happening, how awful.
      - Ann
        
        I think a man being labeled a creep has more to do with how he behaves and not for the act of asking. If a man acts like a ‘creep’ (leers at a woman, gets into her personal space, touches w/o permission, etc.) this gives the impression he doesn’t respect her.
        
        Men tend to be much stronger than women and a man and woman are usually alone during sex. Therefore, a woman will naturally shy away from a man who gives the impression he won’t respect her wishes when it comes to sex.
        
        To put it in perspective, let’s say a huge man who’s easily twice as strong as you and who you have no chance of defending yourself against gives you the impression he’s going to bugger you whether you want him to or not. Would you want to be alone with this man?
    - http://twitter.com/abbeybabbling Abigail Lewis
      
      Hi Connor,
      
      I agree with you that you have every right to offer your opinion and your gender doesn’t change that, but I also have a few questions about some of your objections to the article.
      
      I don’t think the article denies that there are women who have a lot of sex with a lot of different men. There ARE women who have a lot of sex with a lot of different men, and there are men who have a lot of sex with a lot of different women. You have observed that kind of behaviour more often in women, I and some other commenters have witnessed it more in men – that’s because we all come from different countries/areas/societies/systems/classes etc. ‘Women find it easier to get sex than men’, while it might be an honest observation of yours and I wouldn’t accuse you of lying, is still a generalisation because you (and any other single human) only know a very limited cross section of people. Do you think a woman who lives in a society/belief system that prohibits sex for women before marriage finds it easy to ‘get sex’? Yet she too would be branded a ‘slut’ for doing so. Feminism is a transnational movement and, regardless of the restrictions placed on women, the word slut and its equivalents are prevalent all over the globe, and that’s worrying.
      
      What I personally found so stimulating about this article was that it came out and said yes, promiscuity exists in both genders, and it’s not always the healthiest thing. But it’s also unhealthy to brand anyone anything negative for these outward expressions without trying to understand their inner motivations. Men are often able to justify sexual promiscuity with all sorts of semi-valid biological theories – although this too would be sexist since both men and women have a huge number of diverse reasons for entering sexual relationships.
      
      Finally, you compare the premise of this article to the idea that men are less respected if they are unable to carry out extensive physical labour. You seem to argue that that situation is socially accepted, so this one should be too. But in making that argument you accept that situation yourself, even though you clearly disagree with it. Why should men be stigmatised for lack of physical strength? It’s ridiculous, and I’m sure everyone who reads/writes for this site would agree with you – in fact, I’m sure you’d be welcome to write that article as a comparison article on this very site. Men shouldn’t be called pussies and women shouldn’t be called sluts. Neither justifies the other.
      - http://twitter.com/abbeybabbling Abigail Lewis
        
        Oh one final point I forgot to make! A lot of your argument rests on the idea that women who act like sluts, are sluts and should be called sluts. But this ignores that the word ‘slut’ is bandied around to plenty of girls who aren’t sexually promiscuous at all. The word was used about me before I’d ever even had sex. ‘Slut’ is used to describe a girl based on how she dresses, talks to people, whatever. Women use it in anger over flirtation with someone they’re with, men often use it defensively when they’ve been unable to get a girl. ‘Slut’ has become so generalised that it’s used in a variety of hurtful and damaging ways, it’s become totally alienated from whatever it first meant. But it’s still an insult reserved solely for women, and THAT is the misogynistic element of it.
      - Connor
        
        I agree, women get called sluts when they don’t come under the definition, and I never said women don’t get called it, I was saying that other women call women sluts. I’m not going to sit here and say men don’t do it, obviously some do, but in my experience (I have moved around my whole life, pretty much a gypsy without a carivan) women do it much more often. Do I think it needs to stop? Definetly. Do I think the wrong group is being blammed for it? Definetly. If this is to stop, you need to explain to others of your gender the whole thing, because if you’re letting women (from my experience the majority of which call others sluts, are women), then why should men stop doing it?
        Personally, I have seen many men ask women out, and when rejected, some of them kick up a fuss, and the minority of those men do call them sluts. But in all honesty, can that be counted? They’re upset, angry, name calling happens when people feel such things. Just like I wouldn’t blame a woman for calling men all sorts of things when they’re upset, I don’t think it should be put on blame when they’re upset. We all say things when we’re upset, as I’m sure you’re guilty of, too. I’m sure if you ask these men later that week that they don’t think the same things as their they said when the situation happened.
        The dress thing I have got to say is a major area women call other women sluts in. I have seen so many women call other women sluts, and I got appauled.
        
        There are many insults that go out to each group of people, it isn’t exactly an alienated incident when a woman gets called an insult that is specificly meant for women, just like there are words for men, blacks, whites, asian, old people, and so on. None of them are acceptable, but every group has them. It would be to the point that if women were to get rid of all the names that specificly are insults owards women, then they’d be the only group without such insults.
      - http://twitter.com/abbeybabbling Abigail Lewis
        
        You must surely see that it doesn’t matter who is calling the woman a slut! Nowhere in the article are men solely blamed for the use of this word. All genders use the word slut and it’s not acceptable from any mouth. The article doesn’t attack men, it attacks the word slut. Who is doing the name-calling doesn’t matter.
        
        Furthermore, I cannot agree with you that men have higher sex drives than women. I just can’t. It’s too general. Many men have very low sex drives – consider the popularity of Viagra when it was first released! And many women have very, very high sex drives. No group of people has a higher sex drive than any other. What’s problematic is that having a low sex drive as a male, and having a high one as a female, is often wrongly stigmatised.
        
        Your assessment of religion shows a very limited understanding of transnational issues. It’s really surprising that you would suggest a religious woman just ‘remove herself from that system of beliefs’. What if you live in a society where religion and state aren’t separated? Women are stoned to death in many parts of the world for behaviour that you would consider virginal.
        
        You say you believe in total equality. If ‘pussy’ is accepted, then ‘slut’ should be too. But to me, that is an unacceptably passive stance. I could go into ‘no such thing as equality and women must become strong as women not as men’ but I won’t. What I am trying to argue is that neither is acceptable and neither should be accepted. It’s too passive to accept both. I want to change both.
        
        Yes, there are other words that are specifically meant for different groups. But they often have equivalents. For example, a word that’s meant to denigrate men for immoral or annoying behaviour – in Britain we use ‘prick’. This has an equivalent for women – ‘bitch’. Similarly, words used to offend people based on race have equivalents in every race – but of course, I would oppose all these words too. What is so damaging about ‘slut’ is that it has no equivalent in other genders. Earlier you mentioned ‘manslut’ or ‘manwhore’ but I’ve never heard these used as poisonously as slut – in fact, I’ve only heard them used in an almost affectionate, proud context.
      - Connor
        
        You misunderstood what I said. I never said women sleep around more than men, I know both do that pretty much equally nowadays. What I said was that women are more likely to call such women sluts, not that they are more likely to sleep with many different partners. I quite frankly find any male or female doing that as, I wouldn’t say disgusting, but I don’t see them in a positive light. I understand they have every right to do so, but that doesn’t mean I see it as a positive thing, there are too many risks.
        I do see your point in generalisations, but it is partly science that adds to that generalisation being a truth. Although I did say any man will accept sex, obviously going too far there, the vast majority would go for it due to having more of a sex drive. We are not primal beings that just go looking for sex non stop, but when the situation shows an easy access to it, most males would jump for the chance. I think that’s a problem, but it is in our nature due to having a higher sex drive, so I see it as understandable, but I still find it a negative for the male gender, still, an understandable one.
        I do understand religious parts of what you implied. But even still, it is his belief in a higher power that is holding that back, and most males aren’t religious, and a lot of religious people that’s belief say no sex before marriage do have sex before marriage.
        The part you are talking about is due to religious interuptions. If a woman wanted sex, she could just remove herself from that specific group of people and ask a male that doesn’t believe the whole sex before marriage thing like the previous group does, where as if a male was to just bluntly ask “can I have sex with you” to a woman that does not have any religious beliefs holding her back, it is unlikely the male will have sex with the female.
        There are many named being branded to certain people that do certain things and people that don’t do certain things, it’s part of life, and in no way are women the only ones having it done to them, nor the ones having the worst of it. For example, a lot of people believe that if a man doesn’t help a woman being attacked by another man, then he is a “pussy” or “not a real man”. The man has to put his life at risk to help someone else, otherwise he is a “pussy”, regardless if the outcome could result in his death.
        Me personally, I have defended a woman that hit a male first, then the male hit her back. To this day I wish I could take that back, I noticed that even back then (I could be seen as a feminist) I was wrong. ofcourse, I put myself in harms way. I wasn’t exactly the “popular” kid in school, nor was I the bullied, just an average joe. In sticking up for this female that got hit due to her hitting first, the “popular” and “well-built” students started having an aggrewsive manner. I surely would of been injured if it went further. That was when I followed the feminist way of thought, that men shouldn’t hit women regardless.
        Yes, I see your point, some people, male or female, have reasons for sexual relationships. Although, natrually males have higher sex drives. That wouldn’t be an excuse, it would be a reason.
        
        I agree, the whole idea of being a pussy “unrightfully” shouldn’t be allowed. But, if one falls under the definition, then I believe they should be. I believe in equality, real equality, 100%, unconditional equality. If one is allowed, the other is. If one isn’t, the other shouldn’t. I do see your points.
- Ann
  
  It’s okay for men to sleep around because it’s ‘harder’ (I disagree but we’ll assume it is for arguments sake) for them. At the same time it’s bad for women to sleep around because it’s ‘easier’.
  
  First problem with this is the cause-effect relationship. Men are rewarded for showing sexual behavior so they’re more likely to display that behavior. Women are punished for sexual behavior so they’re less likely to display sexual behavior. Women not displaying sexual behavior leads to men not having sex (cause-effect). Encourage women to embrace their sexuality and men won’t have nearly as much trouble acquiring sexual partners.
  
  Second problem is that ease of an action has nothing to do with the morality of it. For example, if it’s harder for me to cause serious injury to someone than Mike Tyson does it make it morally okay for me to attack a person and cause them serious injury? The answer is a clear NO. Yet the argument you used implies that it’s morally okay for men to sleep around because it’s harder for them. That makes no sense.
  
  With all that being said, I do agree with you about women being more at fault. In today’s world there are some rather idiotic and hypocritical men who believe it’s okay for themselves to have casual sex with lots of people but it’s bad for women.
  
  However, the majority of the blame lies with women who say it’s wrong for men to judge women then turn around and degrade a promiscuous woman.
  
  A perfect example of this can be seen when listening to women (especially young women) discuss promiscuous men and women they know. The loose women are insulted (implied to have STDs, are stupid, have no self-respect, have daddy issues, etc.) and are called sluts. The loose men are called by their first name and it’s often the women they sleep with and not them who are insulted (ie ‘Bill has slept with a ton of sluts).
  
  Even if men and women shamed sluts equally. Women would still be more at fault because both genders are more concerned with how members of their own gender view them than how members of the opposite gender view them (especially at a young age).
  
  While true of both genders, it’s more obvious in females when it comes to sex because males and females are socialized differently. Males are taught it’s okay to have sex so don’t condemn males for that behavior while females are taught it’s wrong so they do condemn other females. A similar parallel would be males making fun of a male for crying (b/c males are taught it’s wrong to be emotional) and females comforting a crying female.
Charlie

Interesting intro to slut-shaming article! However, since “female” is a term describing sex, not gender, “the female gender” wouldn’t really be the correct phrasing, right?
Also, Connor, patriarchy hurts both men and women, and is perpetuated by people of any gender, but it is definitely men who formed the basis of our misogynistic society in the first place. So no one’s blaming one side or using them as a scapegoat – a select group is being held accountable. And please check your facts before you start spouting off generalizing differences between men and women.
- Allison
  
  The term “female’ describes both sex and gender. The term “female gender” refers to gendered females, body parts aside.
Jake

boy walks into a room and asks- “who wants to have sex?”; gets kicked out.
girl walks into a room and asks- “who wants to have sex?”; every hand in the room goes up.
NUFF SAID. SLUTS.
- Guest
  
  If that were true, why do men seem to have so more random sex than women? Couldn’t be too hard. And no, if a 400lb, middle aged woman walked into a room, there would be no takers. Let’s get real.
  
  It’s an angry term men use for hot women who like to have sex- just not with them. Men think they’re entitled to hot women and if they can’t get any, those women are just sluts. The truth is, men get just as much action. They’re just lazier, so they think it’s TONS of work, and they feel the need to lie and manipulate to get a woman into bed. All the reasons add up to men having fragile little egos. They really are the gentler sex. Don’t worry boys, we’ll go easy on you.
anon

think of it like this. A key that can open any door is the master key but a door that can be opened by many keys is a broken door
- http://www.facebook.com/alisse.desrosiers Alisse Marie
  
  A pencil sharpener that has sharpened many pencils is clearly a good pencil sharpener, but a pencil that has been sharpened many times is probably worn out and should just been thrown out.
  - Taborlin
    
    anon’s analogy made sense. Yours does not. The more sex a guy has the more experienced he becomes. The better he becomes in bed. Quite the opposite from being worn out. Whereas, the more sex a woman has, the looser she becomes, and then it’s no fun for anyone. But then, that’s what she gets for being a slut.
    - http://www.facebook.com/alisse.desrosiers Alisse Marie
      
      Fun fact: that’s a bullshit lie made up to slut-shame women. Vaginas actually don’t get “looser.” They are incredibly elastic and have the ability to expand and contract, no questions asked. Vaginas will never get “loose,” no matter how much sex a person has. Source: http://health.howstuffworks.com/sexual-health/female-reproductive-system/vagina-definition1.htm
      
      You should probably learn a bit about the female anatomy before attempting to argue with a female about the way her body works
      - knowitall
        
        what a bunch of bull. Ive literally seen women shove gatorade (the big ones) bottles up their pussy. Now a virgin when not be able to do that in the first try. not even a girl whos slept around a bit. Have u ever had a baby? you will never be the same. vaginas do get loose its a damn fact. Why u think they sell dildos the size of your leg?
      - Ann
        
        As stated by Alisse Marie, a vagina is elastic and can therefore stretch greatly to accommodate something bigger.
        Virgins can’t shove a gatorade bottle the first time because they don’t know how to relax their muscles so it’s harder to get anything in.
        A more experienced woman knows how to relax and tighten her muscles. That gives her the ability to relax to let an object in (usually a penis or finger) then she tightens her muscles back up.
    - Ann
      
      Hello Taborline,
      
      According to the situation you presented, the man gains experience and the woman becomes worn out. But remember, a man can’t gain experience without the woman. Therefore “loose” women are partially the result of men who stick it everywhere. The man’s own gain of experience results in women who are “no fun for anyone.” Therefore, men like that have no right to expect to settle down with someone more “virtuous” than the “loose woman.” Remember, men like that are helping to take “virtuous women” out of the “market.”
Taborlin

If a key opens a lot of locks, it’s a master key.

But if a lock is opened by a lot of different keys, it’s a piece of shit lock.
Pingback: мертвое море
Pingback: Exellent Humans Logo Templates
Pingback: Premium Miscellaneous Conceptual Vectors
nowitall

actually it makes total sense. the term slut originally meant dirty and untidy to describe maids of the 15th century. It has ever since taken on a whole new meaning today. The main difference between men and women is that men give it and women take it. men f&*k and women get f@#ked. Men and women are in no way equal its like comparing bananas and pears, sure they’re are both fruits but they are different in many ways. When it comes to work, voting, or opinions there should be equality but physically we are not. And sex is physical. Women just wana have fun until they hit 25 and notice the first wrinkle and realize they are becoming obsolete to the next generation of girls. so they freak out and settle down and either find a partner they lie to about their past or one that is more open and they continue down the pervertedly fun path.
- Mali
  
  Neither a man nor a woman should be promiscuous…however we do know that men are completely different from women in our thought patterns (check out Dr. John Grey’s book “Men are from mars and women from Venus.” Honestly we all have freedom of choice, however no self respecting man wants a woman who has the reputation of a slut. We all make choices and are aware of the consequences of it. Furthermore what we practice now we will do later on. We, both men and women have to consider the love ones in our lives, because at the end of the day we are all someone’s children, or grandchildren, or nephew or niece or somebody’s father or mother. To tell you the truth, and this is the truth- later on in life we regret these things and they do come back to haunt you- I PERSONALLY KNOW. Thinking back, all the sex was good, but if i could do it all over i would opt for another decision. I know my spouse and children (all grown) loves me, but you know deep inside they feel “a little shame” because later and no matter how later on…that reputation you have will never leave you because there is always someone who knows you or know of your past. At first i didn’t care but as i got older i did and the first person i started to care about is myself. Hold your heads high ladies because life is worth much more than and remember, we all make mistakes- and sometimes quite annoyingly make the same ones over and over! Just one minute (60 seconds), ask God to take over your life everyday and to give you the strength to endure the things in this life..
  Enjoy..
Pingback: Your Questions About Dive Watches For Men | Buy Sport Watches Online
Pingback: Extra resources
Pingback: Where to find photography Joomla templates
Pingback: url
Pingback: Leota Boynton
Pingback: caddishly canfieldite join
Pingback: Lamont Mingledorff
Pingback: Hermine Zill
Pingback: North Carolina
Pingback: Heath Paules
Pingback: Franchesca Lathem
Pingback: Douglas Henson
Pingback: Stanley Malave
Pingback: Matthew Scanlon
Pingback: Rodney Ruffcorn
Pingback: Morgan Frodsham
Pingback: Emanuel Polakowski
Pingback: Johnathan Chaban
Pingback: Ollie Erlebach
Pingback: Raymundo Palomarez
Pingback: Ivelisse Likio
Pingback: Valentine Febles
Pingback: Carman Parfitt
Pingback: Kieth Eiesland
Pingback: Tia Clennon
Pingback: Barbera Lacher
Pingback: Katelyn Shirah
Pingback: Nanci Upp
Pingback: Lyndsey Knudsvig
Pingback: Lashell Hulen
Pingback: Edmund Horras
Pingback: Lowell Amat
Pingback: Kathrin Watts
Pingback: Takisha Lamson
Pingback: Waldo Cordas
Pingback: Kindra Stipes
Pingback: Seth Wenzl
Pingback: Abby Dymke
Pingback: Cami Sampere
Pingback: Bertie Sauter
Pingback: Jerrod Urmos
Pingback: Verdell Ronne
Pingback: Ninfa Huell
Pingback: Deloris Votaw
Pingback: Mikel Delorme
Pingback: January Driscoll
Pingback: Lacie Daring
Pingback: Tommy Sferra
Pingback: Korey Boyington
Pingback: http://appitua.tcd.ie/groups/ipad/wiki/50be4/What_One_and_all_Has_to_Learn_about_the_Truth_about_Six_Pack_Abs.html
Pingback: Ramonita Wizwer
Pingback: Lacy Santaloci
Pingback: Mariah Aukamp
Pingback: http://xserver.metiri.com/groups/metiritalk/wiki/11eab/What_All_and_sundry_Should_Learn_about_the_Truth_about_Six_Pack_Abs.html
Pingback: Kellee Grupp
Pingback: Efrain Query
Pingback: Shonta Dante
Pingback: http://8.225.197.11/groups/mrsglowacki/wiki/9e65a/Exactly_what_One_and_all_Should_Find_out_about_the_Truth_about_Six_Pack_Abs.html
Pingback: Cinderella Organista
Pingback: http://servbsr.com/groups/livrettest/wiki/c007b/Just_what_exactly_Every_one_Should_Understand_about_the_Truth_about_Six_Pack_Abs.html
Pingback: http://appwp02.tcd.ie/groups/ipad/wiki/4ff9e/Unlock_your_fantastic_new_music_expertise_considering_the_most_effective_defeat_doing_computer_software.html
Pingback: http://csclab.postech.ac.kr/groups/mine/wiki/2623d/The_magic_of_creating_as_many_as_obtain_your_ex_again.html
Pingback: http://pod003.be/groups/notesdecarl/wiki/edd8b/The_magic_of_constructing_about_obtain_your_ex_back_again.html
Pingback: Charlie Haubrick
Pingback: Collin Kardashian
Pingback: Maryetta Sifre
Pingback: Garth Canney
Pingback: Shelli Feely
Pingback: Octavio Bucci
Pingback: Benny Bator
Pingback: Desirae Mozie
Pingback: Dalila Zieba
Pingback: Mariana Soren
Pingback: Bruce Ciancio
Pingback: Yuki Allaway
Pingback: Joey Touchette
Pingback: Sharan Yard
Pingback: Rocco Toscano
Pingback: Ross Ingber
Pingback: Allen Corbin
Pingback: Asia Vanzanten
Pingback: Kurtis Cokeley
Pingback: Jake Southers
Pingback: Keena Brocato
Pingback: Al Stoppkotte
Pingback: Ethelene Gates
Pingback: Patrick Khora
Pingback: Kathern Chafe
Pingback: Christy Borling
Pingback: Tonja Magness
Pingback: Jefferey Mattila
Pingback: Alia Duryee
Pingback: Thomasena Haberstroh
Pingback: Xochitl Lindberg
Pingback: Corina Tuff
Pingback: Jody Avendano
Pingback: Robbie Vollmar
Pingback: Manual Griffies
Pingback: Lavone Messerly
Pingback: Lee Tinch
Pingback: Evita Moraites
Pingback: Oralee Easton
Pingback: Warner Vantuyl
Pingback: Ingeborg Granade
Pingback: Carin Kalawe
Pingback: Roland Korshak
Pingback: Oscar Bamba
Pingback: Vaughn Prazenica
Pingback: Theron Paskoff
Pingback: Alvaro Mcclurkin
Pingback: Zack Daul
Pingback: Kiera Nantanapibul
Pingback: Nichol Pleasant
Pingback: Johnny Hussy
Pingback: Joanna Espenshade
Pingback: Your Questions About Dive Watches For Men | Buy Sport Watches Online
Pingback: Chance Oldroyd
Pingback: Laine Pillow
Pingback: Julienne Giang
Pingback: Hiram Dahlquist
Pingback: Lakia Wykle
Pingback: Bobette Srock
Pingback: Austin Vecchi
Pingback: Sabina Sherron
Pingback: Reggie Bram
Pingback: Theodore Arterbury
Pingback: Johnathon Kells
Pingback: Andrea Broyhill
Pingback: Frederick Seang
Pingback: Tiffany Rusher
Pingback: Harriett Abril
Pingback: Kitty Hesch
Pingback: Rodney Brindley
Pingback: Roy Muhl
Pingback: Alec Wadhams
Pingback: Kelley Rockmore
Pingback: Bridgett Deakins
Pingback: Bella Selz
Pingback: Julius Siregar
Pingback: Ashley Dominiquez
Pingback: Virgilio Fresh
Pingback: Madalyn Gandert
Pingback: Asa Spuler
Pingback: Franklin Benchoff
Pingback: Norman Bentrem
Pingback: Mia Stoler
Pingback: Lane Heinlen
Pingback: Loreen Nall
Pingback: Arnita Denner
Pingback: Galina Keba
Pingback: Jacob Kindt
Pingback: Mose Aubry
Pingback: Roy Henehan
Pingback: Rick Tiu
Pingback: Chester Beilinson
Pingback: Randolph Strande
Pingback: Matthew Kohel
Pingback: Maximo Teska
Pingback: Lauren Britton
Pingback: Kyle Bermel
Pingback: Humberto Seils
Pingback: Janean Interrante
Pingback: Aurelio Spead
Pingback: Jed Mcbane
Pingback: Alisa Cuttitta
Pingback: Zoe Macknair
Pingback: Patricia Woolf
Pingback: Domenic Leonardo
Pingback: Leon Labor
Pingback: Marlin Avinger
Pingback: Bryant Tiffner
Pingback: Janet Newball
Pingback: Carolyne Helfinstine
Pingback: Jerome Peckens
Pingback: Thurman Shrum
Pingback: Ayako Haseloff
Pingback: Valentine Durkin
Pingback: Joel Slavens
Pingback: Lee Sermon
Pingback: Bryan Benskin
Pingback: Justin Ventress
Pingback: Donald Reliford
Pingback: Allene Baessler
Pingback: Brynn Shuler
Pingback: Mandie Faruolo
Pingback: Glynda Lockery
Pingback: Gilda Blain
Pingback: Rebekah Guempel
Pingback: Jerry Thistle
Pingback: Alejandra Housden
Pingback: Carmen Isgrigg
Pingback: Elwood Kehn
Pingback: Damien Govindeisami
Pingback: Conrad Cataldi
Pingback: Isidro Diggs
Pingback: Gil Elian
Pingback: Inocencia Sprengeler
Pingback: Jimmie Weirich
Pingback: Josphine Lassere
Pingback: Isabelle Rosendale
Pingback: Alonso Benedicto
Pingback: Adam Marum
Pingback: Mac Savitch
Pingback: Christina Monteverde
Pingback: Wanita Granes
Pingback: Wilber Lhommedieu
Pingback: Linh Mewes
Pingback: Ross Mcerlean
Pingback: Tess Candelaria
Pingback: Sydney Shahbaz
anon123

Supply and demand.

I.E.: prostitutes