Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Feminspire | May 19, 2013

Scroll to top

Top

34 Comments

The 5 Worst On-Screen Representations of Women

The 5 Worst On-Screen Representations of Women

It’s no surprise that women’s representation in popular media today is skewed and can not only cause harm the perception of women in real life but the stories are completely unrealistic. This almost does not come as a surprise; not only do women have poor representation but there are hardly any women given speaking roles. There are also virtually no women taking big parts behind the scenes–only 8 percent of directors, 13.6 percent of writers and 19.1 percent of producers were female in 2008, and that is the crux of the problem.

If 92% of directors that are translating their visions to the screen are male, then that  means very little instances in which women are creating a story from a female perspective.

That brings us a top five list of the worst on-screen representation of women.

5. Glee’s Santana Lopez

Naya Rivera’s character is disgustingly stereotypical and hyper-sexualized, making Santana not only a gross representation for women but also for Latinas. She was created and written by three men–superstar Ryan Murphy and his two rinky-dink sidekicks, Brad Falchuk and Ian Brennan–who obviously not only have no idea what it’s like to be one of the only minorities in a white-majority high school. They are completely clueless when it comes to writing a remotely realistic Latina.

4. Little Black Book’s Stacy Holt

Directed by Nick Hurran, Little Black Book is about a manic girlfriend who is obsessed about her boyfriend’s prior relationships and goes on to annoyingly snoop through his personal handheld. All the women in Hurran’s misogynist masterpiece are portrayed at meant to be independent characters who are succeeding in their respective career paths. However, the five prominent women are all nothing with Derek, the man that the entire move centers around; his exes still haven’t moved past him, his current girlfriend is driven to the point of embarrassing insecurity, and even a woman who’s never met Derek becomes obsessed with his past loves. Hurran paints these women in an unrealistic yet typical light: the jealous girlfriend and the ex that will never let you go.

3. Sucker Punch’s “Babydoll”

This 2011 action fantasy film was Robert Snyder’s misogynistic boyhood fantasies repackaged in an attempt to appeal to a female audience as “empowering.” Snyder infantilized and belittled a woman going through genuine hardship and distress by squeezing her into a tiny mini-skirt and giving her pigtails. What part of that sounds empowering? Not to mention sexual assault being exploited and disregarded.

2. Maid in Manhattan’s Marisa Ventura

Wayne Wang’s is a classic tale of America’s insistent white savior complex. Jennifer Lopez’s character plays a stereotypical maid in a high class New York City hotel. However, she is different from all the other Mexican maids because Ralph Fiennes’ handsome white man-ness sees her as a diamond in the rough and sweeps her right off her feet. The story is old and tired and a disgrace for women and Latinas everywhere.

1. Big Bang Theory’s Penny

Chuck Lorre is notorious for being a terrible human being but Kaley Cuoco’s character Penny is his worst creation yet. Lorre is known for writing women as objects simply to be lusted after by man (when faced with a women that could actually be a real character, Sara Gilbert on BBT, the writers dropped her because they “didn’t know how to write for her”).  Penny fits his typical mold as the hot blond who moved to L.A. to be an actress. Penny is Big Bang Theory’s female lead and she doesn’t even have a last name.

There are times when Hollywood does things right–Erin Brockovich, Buffy the Badass, Matilda’s lovely Miss Honey– but those times are few and far between. Especially lately, we are seeing the male-dominated profession becoming lazy. Women are given cheap roles that usually revolve around their male counterparts, as seen in the latest Transformers movies. The surest way to ensure great female visibility in Hollywood is for movie studios to higher a great amount of female directors, writers, and producers to put their creations on the big screen.

Written by Alicia Perez

  • http://twitter.com/zenaidarocio Rocio Rivas ♀

    I JUST found out they dropped Sara Gilbert! How could I not notice? Omg, I feel so bad rn. I loved her! And let me add something to the Penny paragraph: THEY DRESS HER AWFULLY. OH MY GOD. SHE DRESSES LIKE A 2001 BARBIE, JUST -WHAT- IS THE COSTUME DEPARTMENT DOING.

  • Sahra

    SO true. all of this. I never understood Sucker Punch anyway….

    • Sully

      Sucker Punch covered the horrific story of women being abused and killed in a mental hospital with one of the character’s imaginary version of events, filled with skimpy outfits and fight scenes.

  • Mini

    I never realized Penny doesn’t even have a last name, how sad is that!

    But to be fair, BBT did bring out more female characters (Amy and Bernadette), who are both smart scientists. Not that that makes the portrayal of Penny any less tragic.

    • http://www.facebook.com/alicia.potter2 Alicia V. Perez

      That is true but their lives still revolve around men.

      • http://www.facebook.com/JAGuscoth Josh Guscoth

        Well the show is really about them

    • Peggah E

      Just because they’re smart (and only science smart too, Bernadette is still portrayed as terribly ditzy) doesn’t mean they’re good characters or representations of women. It takes more than giving a girl brains to create a strong female character.

      Amy and Bernadette are still novelty characters even though they’ve got advanced degrees. They’re both barely developed and their only role has been to fulfill some kind of romantic storyline for the men–neither of them really have their own “purpose” on the show and it’s clear they were created to pander to viewers’ desires for romance (because Penny/Leonard was gone) and their lives revolve solely around what the men are up to (I guess you could say they’re both sort of weird character foils for Penny but I think that’s REALLY stretching it).

  • http://www.facebook.com/shortmessage Alysa E Friesen

    How did I never notice that Penny doesn’t have a last name! wtf is this?

  • http://www.facebook.com/laurencslavin Lauren Slavin

    Isn’t “Maid in Manhattan’s” white knight everyone’s favorite rom-com stud: Matthew McConaughey?

    • http://www.facebook.com/alicia.potter2 Alicia V. Perez

      nope, it’s Ralph Fiennes! i did the research yo

      • Court

        …Voldemort?

    • http://www.facebook.com/heyhello Riley Rose

      that’s the wedding planner lol

      • http://www.facebook.com/laurencslavin Lauren Slavin

        Same difference :p

  • Eraserhead
    • passingthrough

      I love Movie Bob and watch him all the time. And while he may be right the intention was different, the fact that the execution failed so horribly such that this message is never actually seen is bad story-telling. It’s a subversion, but it’s played so on-the-nose that it ceases to really be that. If you are targeting mainstream audiences and they don’t “get it” then you need to change your delivery method or you are in very real danger of becoming just what you are trying to mock.

      I understand to folks like Movie Bob this is very obvious, and his analysis at least helps support this opinion. But from what I know of Movie Bob just by watching and reading his stuff is that he’s a very smart and analytical person and he can see subtext and connections where the average joe wouldn’t. And he does his research.

      But it’s not just that the intended purpose of the movie wasn’t recognized by a lot of people, it’s more than just the movie itselt. It’s the marketing. And honestly, when this film was marketed nothing really said “witty sarcastic play on a terrible genre here!” Again though, as MB himself says these things rarely work outside of comedy, there is also the marketing element. Nothing that hit mainstream really hit on the nerve of it being an artistic criticism or satire, it played everything pretty straight. There was public hype about the movie that probably didn’t help and maybe somewhere there are elements of the satire remaining, but overall it was really marketed too straight and most people don’t read into subtext and analyse things as hard as MB.

      However, in the end it’s still a terrible representation of women on-screen. Even if we accept the satire and that it is criticizing the things it portrays… it doesn’t take away the fact that it’s still a terrible representation of women. Even with the subtext, it’s a terrible representation of women because *that was the point*. It may not be *targeting* women in this commentary, but it doesn’t erase the fact that the representations are indeed, terrible. Because if MB is indeed correct…. the whole point was the terrible representation.

      Just because it’s intended as satire doesn’t mean that it 1. failed horribly to get this across to the general audience (who is the one paying for the movie tickets and going off to chat about it) and 2. that the representations there-in aren’t god-awful (as that’s the point of them).

      So at MOST the author might be wrong about Snyder and his intent, but NOT about the fact it is one of the worst on-screen representations of women around.

  • disqus_SJ3fszCz3R

    I’m going to scream. You are possibly THE stupidest person i’ve ever met.

  • disqus_SJ3fszCz3R

    I swear to god this is the stupidest thing i’ve ever seen. THEY ARE ACTRESSES AND WRITERS. It’s not sexual assault to get an actress to wear a costume to do with the film. I can’t even think properly because of how stupid this entire thing is.

    • Cyndi Rae

      No it isn’t, and I like Baby Doll. She did almost get raped, though.

  • http://www.facebook.com/liam.r.johnson Liam Rgq Johnson

    Women shouldn’t have any rights, fight me irl fgts!

  • A Lone Wanderer

    The thing is with Feminazis, as I like to call them, is that they don’t want equal rights. They want females to be above males. In films, guys are often portrayed as sex pests, or dumb ‘jock’ types – you don’t see pro-male groups screaming about this at the top of their pathetic lungs, do you?
    It’s like the whole ‘You can’t hit a girl’ joke. What? Girls are allowed to deck a bloke in the face, but a man can’t hit her back because ‘It’s unfair.’ The knife cuts both ways – you either want complete equality, or no equality at all.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Reece-Wilson/592583016 Reece Wilson

      I don’t know where to begin. Men should have no right to complain about any negative portrayal of their gender in media, and do you know why? BECAUSE THEY HAVEN’T BEEN OPRESSED BEFORE. AND THEY NEVER WILL BE. Women have every right to look into how they are portrayed in the media, because very often they don’t get nearly the same amount of effort put into the writing or presentation of their characters as male characters do. It’s not just equality that’s being strived for, it’s respect and a better representation of their gender. WHY do female characters always have to be the object to be fought over? Just because they now have a gung-ho attitude and can “do things on their own!” doesn’t make things any better. it’s not subtle at all, and shows that the writer is clearly pandering to please feminists. But feminists don’t want to be “pandered” to, they just want everyone to just UNDERSTAND that there is an issue with how they are being presented to the world, and that people can just accept a statement, and if they have an issue with it then they can get into an intellectual debate, as opposed to spewing hatred and detrimental comments, which your comment has just proved.

      rant over

    • Ennoia

      “The thing with Blacknazis, as I like to call them, is that they don’t want equal rights. They want to be above whites. In films, whites are often portrayed as overly educated, or are the first characters to die – you don’t see pro-white groups screaming about this at the top of their pathetic lungs, do you?”

      Because anyone who points out the lack of non-stereotypical representations of anyone but white men in films is a HATEFUL OPPRESSOR OMG INFORM THE UNITED NATIONS!!1!one!

      Thank you for demonstrating your utter inability to see beyond your cushy little privilege-bubble. Hopefully it will get even more readers to realize that writers such as Alicia Perez have a point. Because few sane people would deny that most central characters are a) male and b) white, because the writers are. All other characters are thus more often than not treated as ‘other’, reduced to two-dimensional stereotypes based on their non-white-maleness. This is quite apparent when you are not a white male yourself.

      Men of color reading this will therefore already know just how stereotypical and limiting portrayals of ‘other’ demographics are, and just how invisible the media makes them a lot of the time. They should have no trouble seeing that the same is the case with women, and women of color in particular. If you are a man of color (which I take the liberty to strongly doubt), talk to your sister or mother about this and see if you can’t maybe get a clue.

      When the only criticism you manage to level at someone is that they have some hidden agenda instead of criticizing what they are actually saying, it just shows that you can’t find anything about their actual views that is offensive to anyone. Anyone who as much as suggests women should have more power than men will be verbally tarred and feathered in the vast majority of feminist circles–because it harms our cause to have hateful whackjobs in our midst who want to replace one kind of oppression with a different kind of oppression, and because we are universally opposed to oppression of any demographic.

      And well done parroting a stupid and multi-offensive term like ‘Feminazi’ while talking as though this is some witty thing you came up with. You’re just eating up the mental diarrhea of woman-haters and regurgitating it (ew, IKR). Have some dignity and decency, why don’t you.

  • Bridget

    FEMINAZIS: STOP WATCHING SHITTY TV SHOWS/HOLLYWOOD MOVIES. Stop getting so fucking angry over all of that. If you don’t like it, don’t watch it. Most television and Hollywood movies are horrible in general anyway.
    Also, stop hating men. If it weren’t for them, you wouldn’t be here. You all make me ashamed of being a female.

    • http://www.facebook.com/joanarmageddon Hannah Sheehan

      Believing men and women should have equal representation in all walks of life, including entertainment: equivalent to fascism and genocide.

  • Guest

    While I agree with this list, I noticed that your list is only to two races of women; White and Latina. What about Asian and black women?

  • KailiaSage

    While I do agree with this, why does your list have no other race but white and latina? That just seems so close minded to me. I’m sorry, but really, as an Asian, I’m sure you could have found some other women to put on this list too!

  • Deb

    Glee and the Big Bang Theory are comedies. A technique of comedy is stereotyping characters. Santana from Glee has a main issue of beig a lesbian which the show portrays very well. Her being Latino has little consequence and in its essence, Glee is about representing minorities. The Big Bang Theory also portrays scientists as geeky, unloved and with no social skills.

    To earlier comments about men never being oppressed- throughout history many men are oppressed. What about black slavery where men(and granted women) were sold like cattle. What about today’s time where gay men are persecuted by men and women?

    It’s time feminists realise that their founding sisters fought for equality -not to be better than men.

    • Ennoia

      FFS, please stop this whole “feminists want to oppress men” rhetoric. Where apart from in the imagination of anti-feminists is that even true? Also ‘founding sisters’ sounds like feminists have this big umbrella organisation. You realize there are many, many different kinds of feminists? We are not some monolithic group. And saying “Feminists have got to stop trying to oppress men by being all about women” or whatever it is people with a tenuous graps of reality always say, well that’s a bit like accusing every single religious person of believing in creationism and shunning science. Actually, it’s way worse because creationists are out and about lobbying for their beliefs but I don’t see ANY of the rampant man-hate people love to cite when talking about feminists (and I frequent plenty of feminist sites). Enough already, stop disparaging feminists and spreading falsehoods.

      Homophobia is a direct result of sexism, by the way, and in a world full of feminists, it would automatically disappear since there would be no more stigma in being something other than a manly macho male who sees himself as above women. Gays are looked down upon as being too much like women to be men, and in this world, being a woman is a bad thing. Erase that, and you erase homophobia. Simple.

      You are misunderstanding people when they say “Men have never been oppressed”. OBVIOUSLY, nobody is claiming that no man in history has suffered oppression! They are saying that men have never been oppressed just for being men, unlike women, who are and have always been oppressed for being women. Do you see the difference?

      Look at slavery in the US. That was oppression of black people, not of
      men. Look at homophobia. It’s oppression of gay people, not of men. If an ethnicity or religion is attacked, it’s both men and women. That is not oppression of men. Look at the dowry killings, infanticide, murder, trafficking, slaving, disappearance, abuse, rape and systematic deprivation of females all over the world. That’s oppression and even genocide of women. Look at the reproductive rights issue in the US. That is oppression of women. Do
      you understand? Men have never been oppressed for being men, and nobody is trying to make it that way now.

  • Pingback: fsgb80v7cbwe

  • Pingback: bluestone accresce backbreaking

  • Pingback: unitech barcode scanners

  • Pingback: Don Clamp

  • Pingback: website viec lam tot nhat

  • Pingback: dwi lawyers Phoenix