Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Feminspire | May 23, 2013

Scroll to top

Top

14 Comments

Michelle Obama’s Style Choices Send A Strong Message

Michelle Obama’s Style Choices Send A Strong Message

The sartorial choices of women in politics are all too frequently emphasized in place of their professional accomplishments in the media. Michelle Obama, however, is something of an expert at using her wardrobe to propel her message forward. Her fondness of shopping at J. Crew and Target has helped secure her status as a relatable mom, but Mrs. Obama is equally at ease in the high fashion world and has used her life in the public eye to support up-and-coming American designers. She is a not a “reluctant style icon,” but a powerful, intelligent woman who cares about politics and enjoys fashion, too.

At the Democratic National Convention on Tuesday, Mrs. Obama delivered a powerful speech focusing on her life with Barack, the concerns of the middle class, and ultimately, the triumph of the American dream. She stunned the audience in a pink brocade dress by Tracy Reese, a self-made African-American businesswoman whose ready-to-wear label has become a favorite of the First Lady. The decision to wear one of Reese’s designs, which fall on the more accessible end of the designer spectrum (dresses typically retail between $200 and $400), was a wise move for a speech that drew strength from personal anecdotes of the Obama family’s own struggle to make ends meet. Her shoes were from J. Crew, an upscale but accessible store that can be found in almost any American mall.

While Mrs. Obama’s support of Tracy Reese is an example of dresses that can be found in department stores finding their place in the closet of the First Lady, the story of Jason Wu is evidence of Michelle Obama’s influence making its way from the runway to the closets of the average American woman. Wu, who was born in Taiwan and later emigrated to the United States, saw his career take off after Mrs. Obama wore his designs for high-profile occasions such as an interview with Barbara Walters during the 2008 election, the 2009 inaugural ball, and the cover of Vogue. In early 2012, Wu released a collaboration with Target that had customers lining up outside stores in anticipation of its release – an amazing feat for a 29-year-old designer whose name was barely known four years ago.

The success stories of Reese and Wu certainly fit in with the Obamas’ narrative of hard work, optimism, and keeping the American dream alive, and Michelle Obama’s ability to marry style with her message is refreshing. Powerful women are often met with a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” scenario when it comes to their appearances: an interest or a lack of interest in fashion are both widely considered fair game for scrutiny, and it’s long overdue for that to change.

What do you think of Obama’s outfit for her speech at the DNC? Do you think her fashion choices send a strong message to the American people? Join our discussion in the comments below!

Written by Tricia Gilbride

  • GenuinelyCrooked

    If someone can link me to *any* article about a male politician’s choice of clothes, this won’t piss me off. But assuming that they can’t, can we *please* SHUT UP about the clothes that powerful women wear? Unless it’s something outlandish like a tu-tu, I don’t want to hear about it. I want to hear about the politics.

    • Tricia Gilbride

      I think the point we were trying to make with this article is that EVERYTHING done by anyone in politics is scrutinized for a message these days. If a male politician shows up to an event with no jacket & his sleeves rolled up, people talk about how they’re trying to be “folksy” or whatever: Like here:
      http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/08/12/double-the-pommade-the-aggressively-groomed-style-of-romney-and-ryan.html

      I disagree with writing about the fashion choices of women in politics who don’t invite that conversation, but I also don’t think that saying that it is always a bad conversation is good either. In elections seasons, people pay attention to everything – even stuff like what’s on Paul Ryan’s iPod. I do think that the focus should be more geared towards the issues than it currently is, but I think being dismissive of fashion in general is unfortunate because fashion, as Greta Christina so wonderfulyl wrote ” one of the very few art forms/ languages/ forms of expression in which women have more freedom than men.”

      We chose to talk about Michelle’s dress because a) she is sending a message with the designers she chooses to support and b) she enjoys fashion and we think it’s important to emphasize the fact that interest in things like fashion and politics don’t have to be mutually exclusive and it’s even cooler when someone who possesses both of those interests able to do so without having to compartmentalize them.

      • http://www.facebook.com/rhiannonmarypayne Rhiannon Payne

        Yes. Thank you. Very well said.

    • MissMegabyte

      I agree with you. I’m tired of hearing ‘what Michelle is saying with her clothes’ or any other female in power as well. Does anyone ask what Obama is saying with his suits? Are there countless articles on his tie colour and how great it is he is supporting designers? NO!

      It’s not a ‘bad conversion’ to have. But it’s just reinforcing old retoric, you’d expect something a bit more progressive on and feminism website.

      You also have to wonder what sort of message is being sent by writing about Michelle’s clothes so.dam.much.

      Here’s a line from an interview with Hilary Clinton:
      Interviewer: Okay. Which designers do you prefer? Hillary Clinton: What designers of clothes? Interviewer: Yes. Hillary Clinton: Would you ever ask a man that question? Interviewer: Probably not. Probably not.

      • http://www.feminspire.com/ Jess Mary

        Question: If Michelle Obama was interested in art, was an art collector, would you think it was fair game to talk about that/her preferences in art?

        • MissMegabyte

          It’d be weird to write about her art passion in relation to political speech she had given the day before, which had nothing to do with art.

          • http://www.feminspire.com/ Jess Mary

            So it would only be weird because it was unrelated?

            Her speech was about the middle class and the American dream and the restoration of that. Her clothes were chosen to support that message. Why not recognize it for what it is–not “silly and frivolous”, but a powerful form of communication that Michelle Obama has mastered?

          • MissMegabyte

            Or why not choose to talk about that other (maybe even more) powerful form of communication she used that night – speech?

            But no, here’s another article on why how a women looks is more important than what she is saying.

          • http://www.feminspire.com/ Jess Mary

            I get where you’re coming from, but I don’t think this article says that how she looks is more important than what she’s saying.

            I think part of the issue is that fashion is so denigrated. It’s a sign of not having substance, of being vapid, even though it’s a form of art and communication. Why? Because it’s associated with women? What I believe this article was trying to do was make a case that fashion is a thing with substance and women who are interested are not vapid, and this is one example how.

          • MissMegabyte

            My bad, I didn’t realize I was on a fashion website.

          • http://www.feminspire.com/ Jess Mary

            not exclusively a fashion website, but partially, yes? that’s why there’s a tab that says “fashion.” fashion from a feminist perspective–which, considering the VAST numbers of women and girls who are interested in fashion, and the overwhelming destructiveness of the mainstream fashion media, is important.

          • Tricia Gilbride

            yes exactly

          • Tricia Gilbride

            We didn’t mean to imply that what she looked like was more important than what she was saying, but this article was not an article about her speech, it’s about how she is using fashion as a method of communication.

  • Pingback: Michelle Obama’s Style Choices Send A Strong Message | Placedelamode