Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Feminspire | May 26, 2013

Scroll to top

Top

21 Comments

Everything You Need To Know About The Chick-Fil-A Outcry

Everything You Need To Know About The Chick-Fil-A Outcry

So you want to talk about free speech?

Free speech is a pretty awesome thing.

So awesome, in fact, that the Framers of the U.S. Constitution gave us a guarantee that we would be free from government interference in our right to freedom of expression and speech, and this right is now considered to be a cornerstone of our national identity.

We’ve heard a lot (and I mean a lot) about free speech just this week alone, what with the “Free Pussy Riot” movement in Russia (just a hint: for those of you brought here based on that searchable term, it’s not what you think) and the stand taken by the patrons of one fast food chain here in the U.S.

Chick-Fil-A, Inc. is known the country over for their waffle fries, being closed on Sundays, and by now, for the COO’s views on same-sex marriage.

Chick-Fil-A Waffle Fries

On July 16, Chick-Fil-A’s president and COO Dan Cathy said in an interview with the Baptist Press, a news wire service with a “Christian perspective,” that he was “guilty as charged” in his support for the “traditional family.”

LGBTQ rights activists and same-sex marriage advocates reacted with swift outrage, calling for boycotts of the company claiming to be driven by biblical principles, including the “one man, one woman” definition of marriage.

Chick-Fil-A President and COO Dan CathyImage courtesy of Chick-Fil-A / July 18, 2012.

Perhaps the nails in the coffin on this controversy were Cathy’s previous comments on “The Ken Coleman Show,” a weekly syndicated radio show:

We’re inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at him and say we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage… I pray God’s mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude that thinks we have the audacity to redefine what marriage is all about.

The backlash was also provoked by Chick-Fil-A’s financial support – to the tune of $5 million – of groups campaigning against LGBTQ rights and of anti-gay organizations purporting to use religious means to alter someone’s sexuality, including the Family Research Council, which is classified by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a hate group.

The outcry from the LGBTQ community provided former preacher and Fox News host Mike Huckabee with the divine inspiration to proclaim Aug. 1 as “Chick-Fil-A Appreciation Day,” encouraging his fellow Christians and same-sex marriage opponents to go out and patronize a company that abides by “biblical principles.”

There was something else about fighting for Cathy’s right to free speech (which was apparently in danger of being trampled upon by renegade gay rights activists moonlighting as the politically correct thought police), but it appeared to be little more than a gleeful “in your FACE, gay agenda” than a celebration of one man’s right to freely proclaim his religious views.

Coverage of the record profits for the company and lines out the door at many stores occupied much of the day on Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr. 

Hundreds line up for "Chick-Fil-A Appreciation Day"Image courtesy of Mike Haskey / AP.

“Can’t say anything anymore without somebody getting offended, what ever happened to freedom of speech?” was the overall tone, accompanied by photos of people with their chicken sandwiches and waffle fries.

Now, this is where Chick-Fil-A’s supporters lose me.

I fervently believe that Cathy (and everyone else) is not only permitted but ought to be encouraged to say whatever he wishes without provoking the thought police to lock him up and throw away the key.

Sure, there was a backlash. There were picketers with signs and “kiss-ins” at Chick-Fil-A stores nationwide.

Protesters outside a Georgia Chick-Fil-A storeImage courtesy of David Tulis / AP.

There were articles upon articles and Facebook status after Facebook status – people on both sides posting in reaction to the original comments as well as the multiple waves of ensuing backlash.

With so much text and so many conversations going on about this issue, I’m left wondering: where is it exactly that people think our right to freedom of speech went?

Looks to me like we’ve still got it.

Sure, the mayors of Chicago and Boston raised a ruckus and threatened to deny operation licenses to any new Chick-Fil-A stores wanting to open within the city limits.

But they won’t actually do that. Such actions are quite clearly unconstitutional and would be struck down by the courts in a minute if a hypothetical court case ever even made it before a judge.

Free speech is a funny thing, but when people cry foul because one group comes out criticizing what another group says, it doesn’t really seem like they fully grasp what free speech is all about. Free speech means that dissent is welcomed.

Dissent isn’t counter to free speech – it is the embodiment of free speech.

One last thing: freedom of speech doesn’t mean you are immune from criticism. It just means you have the right to fire back against that criticism in your own defense.

Did you go eat at Chick-Fil-A on August 1st? Are you boycotting it? Join the discussion in the comments section!

Written by Savannah Thomas
Find her on Twitter and on Tumblr.

Opinions stated in our editorials do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Feminspire and its staff as a whole, but instead reflect the opinions of the writer.

Header image courtesy of Don Bartletti / Los Angeles Times.

  • http://www.facebook.com/lolco Lexie Cooper

    I got angry about this when I saw it on the news and made a growling noise at the TV. My mom told me I was overreacting. Ugh.

  • Liz

    I’m just wondering why Chick Fil A was the one that set everything off. I mean, the guy who owns Urban Outfitters is also vocal about his anti-gay stance, but there hasn’t been a national outcry like this.

    • http://twitter.com/SavannahKThomas Savannah Thomas

      I think those who are more inclined to join an anti-boycott like the one at Chick-Fil-A aren’t necessarily patrons of Urban Outfitters? I definitely don’t shop there anymore, but I think the main reason we don’t hear as much is because there’s not any push back by same-sex marriage opponents against UO boycotts by same-sex marriage advocates.

      • Nynrose

        I have never heard of Urban Outfitters. I have, however, heard of Chick-Fil-A. That might be the reason why people are not boycotting the other place. Not everyone knows what an Urban Outfitters actually is.

    • http://www.robotsandlace.com/ Jess Mary

      unfortunately, I think it’s also the fact that the people who are likely to shop at UO are the same people to get up in arms about this and they are much more comfortable boycotting a fast food chain.

  • Ashley

    Succinct and spiffy article. Thanks!

  • Rose Johansson

    I have never fully understood the American stance on freedom of speech. I agree with almost everything said in this article about the subject and about its relation to this particular situation in the United states. I struggle with the concept that because you have the right to say what ever you want, you should say what ever you want; regardless of weather it is offencive, racist, sexist, or homophobic or just generally wrong. Can it not be agreed upon that there are some things people say which perhaps should not be said? Or at least should not be said in a certain format, for political gains, or in a given situation or context. I am a Canadian, and I too have the right to freedom of speach, although slightly altered. I cannot publish or spread in any way racial hatred, I cannot make sexist, homophobic or any ther predujdiced comments without some kind of concequence (this of course does depend on the context of the situation, My psition of influence etc.. The penalities for such breaches do seem to be much more severe for people in higher positions of authority ex: politicians, police officers, or people publishing and spreading lituerature etc). I very very strongly agree with this twist on freedom of speach in Canada. Some things are wrong and shouldn’t be tolerated. I do acknowledge that in this particular situation no strong anti gay or lesbian statement was made but simply a statement relating to the owners support of the “traditional family”. This situation is not perhaps a perfect example of something that perhaps wouldn’t not be tolerated in Canada (or many other countries; england for example). The protesters and other people speaking out against this issue, had a very good reason to be doing so. I disagree with Savannah Thomas’s claim that the people offended by the anti gay and lesbian comments made by the involved parties should simply speak out and use their own freedom of speach to counter the attacks made against them by the people associated with chick-fil-a. The comments should never had been made. Language is an incredibly powerful tool, words have strength. They should not be used to expess Predjudice. If they are used in such a way they certainly should not bolster a companies fame or their profits. In my opinon what was said was very Wrong and the voices of the protesters are not being heard as strongly as those of the people from the right wing media or from Chick-fil-a. As the auther herself said;

    “Sure, the mayors of Chicago and Boston raised a ruckus and threatened to deny operation licenses to any new Chick-Fil-A stores wanting to open within the city limits.

    But they won’t actually do that. Such actions are quite clearly
    unconstitutional and would be struck down by the courts in a minute if a
    hypothetical court case ever even made it before a judge.”

    So what good did freedom of speach get the protesters and the people who were crying out aginst the clearly prejudiced comments? As far as I can tell there have been no consequences to the people at Chick-fil-a. Perhaps something does need to be done more than simply offering the offended parties their own freedom of speach.

  • ConcernedCitizenNPlusOne
  • Pingback: мертвое море

  • Pingback: Awesome Other Characters Vectors

  • Pingback: Premium Miscellaneous Conceptual Vectors

  • Pingback: link

  • Pingback: Brittaney Depaoli

  • Pingback: http://mdnarch.com/ee/index.php/member/2722

  • Pingback: Winford Johe

  • Pingback: Rev Genes

  • Pingback: http://www.23hq.com/shame06pink/story/10339938

  • Pingback: Kieron

  • Pingback: scam web host

  • Pingback: tes c789

  • Pingback: tesc 789