Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Feminspire | May 20, 2013

Scroll to top

Top

12 Comments

British National Party Leader Nick Griffin Spouts Hate on Twitter

British National Party Leader Nick Griffin Spouts Hate on Twitter

Ladies and Gentleman, Nick Griffin has done it again. He’s made me so angry that I’m having to write out my feelings to avoid throwing things and/or bursting into tears. For those of you that don’t know, Nick Griffin is the leader of the British National Party (BNP) here in the UK, and a Member of the European Parliament (MEP). The BNP is an extremely right wing political party, and is generally perceived as being unaccepting of people. The party’s views, and Griffin’s in particular, are homophobic, xenophobic and massively Islamophobic. Needless to say, as a bisexual daughter of an immigrant, they’re not one of my favourite groups of people.

Today Griffin took to Twitter to tweet about the ruling on the case where Christian Bed and Breakfast owners, Susanne and Mike Wilkinson, refused to allow a gay couple, Michael Black and John Morgan, to stay in the same bed of their B&B establishment. They have been found guilty of unfair discrimination and ordered to pay a fine of £3,600.

Yes, that is actually something that a representative of my country said in a public forum. The text that I’ve whited out is actually the address of the gay couple involved in the case, along with a clear threat. There is every danger that people will read that and see it as an incitation for violence. In retaliation people have released Nick Griffin’s own address, but two wrongs do not make a right. That will do nothing but fuel his fire. Those tweets are actually illegal to post, so there is a good chance that he will have heavy legal sanctions put on in, we don’t need to do anything but wait. If nothing happens, then we can gleefully call for him being stripped of his seat.

The bit that got me furiously angry was the use of a single word: heterophobia. When the vast majority of society is straight and very heteronormative, how on earth can anything be heterophobic? Where are the examples of centuries of perseucution? Where are the suicides of school children after years of heterophobic bullying? Where are the couples afraid to walk hand in hand down a street in case they get “Straight!” screamed at them? There simply aren’t any, and until there are I refuse to entertain the idea of heterophobia.

This brings me to his final tweet, about how left and gay activists should be targeting Muslims instead of Christians. Nowhere in this entire case has Islam or any of its followers been involved. He has literally just randomly thrown that in there from his own hateful mind. He seems to have it set in his mind that Christians are the good guys, whilst he’s previously said in speeches that Islam is “a wicked, vicious faith”  that tries to conquer countries. He thinks that a Christian couple getting a fine is straight up discrimination, but still can’t recongise that these disgusting claims are the true form of discrimination.

Standing up for your rights isn’t bullying, and these people weren’t activists. They were just a couple looking for a place to stay for a night. They didn’t deserve to be turned away, and they certainly didn’t deserve to have their home address broadcast on the Internet. Neither do Muslims deserve the hatred that they are forced to endure from this man and many others like him in this country. I’m ashamed to have him represent me in the EU Parliament, and I very much hope these tweets means that he won’t be there for much longer.

If you also want to take a stand against Nick Griffin, Change.org currently has a petition to ban him from twitter.

What do you think of Nick Griffin and his comments? Share with us in the comments section below.

Written by Abigail ‘Chazza’ Chalrinho

  • http://profiles.google.com/hplunatic Runa Zaman

    While I find what he has to say extremely offensive as a liberal and a Muslim, a petition to ban him from Twitter is just censorship and really does not solve the actual problems here. Are there alternative forms of action?

    • http://www.facebook.com/alisse.desrosiers Alisse Marie

      It’s not censorship. Why is it always about censorship?

      Freedom of speech =/= freedom from consequences. Getting banned from Twitter would be a consequence of his actions. Hate speech does not need to be tolerated because of “”"free speech”"”

    • http://twitter.com/abbeybabbling Abigail Lewis

      I don’t just want him banned from Twitter, I want him banned from my Parliament. And no, I don’t consider it censorship, I consider it just punishment for breaking the law and deliberately spouting hateful and hurtful incitations to violence

    • http://www.feminspire.com/ Jess Mary

      It’s important to remember that Twitter is a private company based in
      the US (and I assume operates under US laws). They have the right to
      create terms and conditions for the use of their product, just as
      Facebook does, and if they choose to make hate speech a violation, they have that right.

      I
      actually love this quote on free speech (from the website of the Ayn
      Rand Center for Individual Rights, which blows MY mind too because
      generally I don’t like anything associated with Ayn Rand)

      “Freedom of speech means the freedom to communicate ideas without government
      suppression or interference or punitive action. It protects the individual’s
      ability to think and to express his thoughts in material form, whether spoken,
      written, filmed, staged, or otherwise depicted visually. It does not, however,
      guarantee him the material means to implement this right. It does not guarantee
      a writer that his book will be published—only that if someone chooses to
      publish his book, the government cannot interfere. No private action qualifies
      as censorship: the refusal to listen to others or to give them a platform to
      speak is an exercise of free speech—not its abrogation.”

      http://principlesofafreesociety.com/freedom-of-speech/

    • Emma

      It would solve the actual problem of him posting people’s addresses on Twitter, as a start.

  • http://www.facebook.com/alisse.desrosiers Alisse Marie

    MEEK AND FORGIVING CHRISTIANS

  • http://www.facebook.com/jonsan.johnson Jonsan van Johnson

    “The BNP is an extremely right wing political party, and is generally perceived as being unaccepting of people.”

    Understatement of the year.

    Slightly off topic, but The Times’ reporting of this story today mentioned that the B+B owner at the centre of the case complained about the verdict, arguing that equal rights rulings “go too far” when they dictate what people can do in the privacy of their own home.

    EXCEPT IT’S NOT YOUR PRIVATE HOME, YOU OPENED YOUR HOUSE UP TO THE PUBLIC AS A BED AND BREAKFAST. NO ONE FORCED YOU TO DO THIS. THE GUYS HAD PAID FOR A ROOM IN YOUR HOUSE, AND YOU DIDN’T WANT TO GIVE IT TO THEM BECAUSE YOU DON’T WANT THE GAYS IN YOUR HOUSE. AND THEN YOU ACT ALL SHOCKED AND APPALLED WHEN PEOPLE CALL DISCRIMINATION? GODDAMN LADY.

    • Kaya

      Truth. Haven’t we learned that operating a business/public service then making stipulations about who can/can’t use it is a VERY BAD IDEA?

  • Niamh

    So there’s “reverse racism”, “reverse sexism” and now “heterophobia”??? Poor lil straight white cis men :(

  • http://www.jmkeep.com/ Anjasa

    This guy is a jackass, but I’m not that surprised. I mean, he runs a political party that’s a splinter off the National Front.

    I firmly believe that he needs to be mocked and ridiculed every time he speaks, however.

  • http://www.facebook.com/marlenaraec Marlena Carcone

    I can’t even deal with this bullshit.

  • Pingback: Rev Genes